But the sensible women I've talked to so far are terrified even as they're in positions of power. 

I'm glad you said that. One woman, I spoke to mentioned to me, "I've never been afraid of men." 

I asked her what she's afraid of and she said, "I guess what I'm afraid of is weak women." 

It's reprehensible. Smuggling ideology under the guise of compassion. 

When we're interacting with the world, what we're trying to do is to extract a set of tools. 

So that we don't suffer too much and so the things that we need to continue can be provided.

And we need to do it in a way that others will cooperate and compete with us in a peaceful way.

What the postmodernists realised was that if you took a complex book, let's say the Bible:

There's an endless number of interpretations you can derive from it because it's so complex!

So their conclusion was there's no right way to interpret the text, so you can do it any way.

Where the Marxism creeped up: "People interpret the world to facilitate their acquisition of power."

The AI people ran into the Frame Problem, which is there're infinite ways to look at an object.

So vision turns out to be way way more complicated than anybody estimated!

They played sleight of hand with Marxist ideas, instead of promoting the working class revolution. 

They started to play identity politics and separated everyone into oppressed versus oppressor.

Derrida was a Marxist but that fell out of favor cause Marxist doctrine kept producing evil empires.

They say "we're doing it on behalf of the oppresed transexual people."

That's what you say, but there's no reason I should believe that! I don't believe anything you say!

I think you're contemptible, cowardly, ideologically motivated corruptors of the youth!

So why would I use your language!?

I don't like to see the postmodern Neo-Marxists use the transsexual issue to push political nonsense

I'm not willing to cede the linguistic territory

You don't seem to have any hate towards trans people. You seem pretty accepting of anybody.

I'm more concerned whether or not people are honest.

You know "everybody that makes up a group is the same."

Except men and women. Cause they can be anything.

There's an interesting angle, these activists claim they're standing up for oppressed communities.

And because they happen to be members of these communities that they're now representatives of it.

This is being taught to children. Look up the gender unicorn?

What is the gender unicorn?

A symbol for children that shows biological sex, gender and sexual proclivity vary independently.

They're going after them very young.

It's a common thread with male feminists, they align themselves with women as allies.

They take the moral high ground and they're really just mining the situation for social points.

Social and sexual points. There's something seriously creepy about it.

A lot of the people who were protesting were standing behind a hammer and sickle banner.

I can't figure out why you can't do that with a Nazi symbol but you can with a hammer and sickle.

Maybe it's because the Nazi doctrine is so explicitly racist, 

But it's not like the hammer and sickle wasn't equally murderous.

You were denied a grant for the first time in your history as an academic.

You think this is based on your outspoken denouncing of political correctness?

I suspect the fact the grant application concentrated on delineating the personality characteristics