"I'm concerned this reeks of conspiracy theory", 

"Given the delicacies of the situation, I need a lot more evidence before I give this a go-ahead",  

These are things you say when you're trying to shut down a line of inquiry. 

being run with knowledge of governments that may have involved pedophilia and was not shut down. 

That interview was one of the most remarkable footage anybody has ever seen on TV bar none. 

It went brilliantly for us because it's effectively an admission that something is so off. 

He was behaving like a high 11-figure type guy with what appears to be a 9-figure fortune. 

I, in fact, called my wife at the time, and said, 'This man appears to be a construct.' 

It's like they've hired an actor to play a hedge fund manager. 

He didn't have any of the substance you would normally associate with people of that class. 

Scientists should be immunized from the market. 

The problem is there are people who do not want that and they currently have powerful interests. 

You may have to decide that you have to pay for it, not at a level that the market will bear 

but at a higher price because it's in the long-term interest of your society's survival. 

You can't be xenophobic because you realize we can't be open borders 

And you can't be open borders because you realize that close borders and xenophobia is nonsense. 

We need to continue struggling between 2 competing ideas than simply sign up with 1 because its easy

Immigrants aren't simply hardworking people and they're not simply gang members or welfare queens. 

This is the idiocy of the mainstream media that they are trying to corner us into. 

To me, any candidate that is broadly acceptable to the institutions is dead on arrival. 

The subset of people I am interested in should be broadly unacceptable to the major institutions. 

And this is across the board for Left and Right. 

We are making it so unpleasant to hold real opinions and have real integrity. 

A multi-polar world is a frightening prospect not because you don't want many voices to have a say 

But because the game theory of a multi-polar world is highly unstable. 

It's not clear what happens when you have 13 players with credible threats.

It cannot be done with 4-5 voices in a panel in 10 minutes with a few commercial interruptions. 

Almost nothing can be discussed that way.

What's worse, people who can actually discuss ideas will never be invited in those shows.