We are finally ready to  take on something that I have always found terrifying

Idea Suppression

The treatment of Andrew Yang by the media is one example (of many) of how the DISC works.

There are many documented incidents of the media working to  sabotage his campaign.

The question is why is there no media outlet reporting on this.

Why does the media employ strategic silence or strategic distortion to sabotage candidates?

This is a David and Goliath moment.  

The Gated Institutional Narrative has been spoiling for a fight.

Can you imagine how many great ideas have been suppressed if I know of three in my own family?

We need to elevate the non-conformists and do battle with the institutions to bring about prosperity

Why are there no living heros anymore?

Since Lindbergh it has been rare to elevate a person to the point they can threaten institutions

The purpose of  The Portal is to create a channel that has never existed for presenting ideas.

Peer review is actually peer suppression.  It came out of an effort to quality control ideas.

It was perfectly constructed for abuse.

My major focus on the DISC is what happens inside universities.

In physics no progress has been made in 40 years, but every new idea is basically dead on arrival.

When you are young and vulnerable and come forward with good ideas you are slammed

but these ideas can be then taken up by the older members of the community.

The news media used to investigate stories like what's going on with Jeffrey Epstein

but no one even asked the intelligence agencies as to whether Epstein worked for them.

There are so many mysteries but the media refuses to investigate.

Our sense making apparatus is broken.

The DISC stands for the Distributed Idea Suppression Complex

The center of it is idea suppression.   

The DISC  principally protects institutions from individuals making valid and reasonable points.

What if the  most important ideas were outside of the GIN, that we had everything backwards?

Carbs were not healthy, but bad for you, the great moderation increased risk of financial collapse,

Cultural diversity was not a strength but a weakness

Immigration did not lead to prosperity but was an instrument of distribution.